Category Archives: Legislation

House Climate Crisis Committee is out of touch with climate reality

“The House Climate Crisis Committee held their first public meeting here in Boulder today.  Temperature is 80 degrees, and Boulder is the greenest anyone has ever seen it this time of year. The Governor declared a “climate crisis” today – after the best ski season and the coolest, greenest summer on record. He wants the state to go 100% renewable energy, which would make it impossible for anyone to get to the ski areas.” click here

Nothing new under the sun; Carbon tax proposals simply repeat failed policies of the past

“It estimates the tax would bring in $12 billion in revenue, which would then be distributed in part as a rebate to low income families. A portion also would be used to invest in clean energy. The bill aims to reduce U.S. carbon emissions 55 percent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050.” click here

The most effective action to address “climate change”…is to take no action.

“Some voices are well-intentioned but wrongheaded. Some voices use climate as a stalking horse for their real agenda — i.e., system change to socialism. Some see business or “rent- seeking” opportunities in climate alarm. Some go along with climate out of political correctness.

As we have shown — and have done so exclusively through the voices and reports of climate alarmists — there is absolutely no reason for any Republican to offer a plan to “combat climate change.” Such a plan, if enacted would accomplish nothing good for American or the climate.” click here

Democrats rely on name-calling (not science) at Natural Resources Committee hearing

Proposed Safe Drinking Water Act of 2017 (HR 1068)

If history is repeated the Democrat proposal to amend the Safe Drinking Water Act is a strategic set-up for 2018 elections.. Yes, the Safe Drinking Water Act needs to be amended and reauthorized. But will the provisions of this bill be seriously considered? Stay tuned.

Full text of HR 1068 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 2017

WRDA 2014: A porker of legislation

Might as well call it what it really is. A lot of people are on the government dole and have become dependent on this legislation which comes up every 2 years. And lobbyists, large firms, and industry groups fight hard behind the scenes to get their projects funded. Since all of the key agencies and players if not everybody in congress gets something out of this bill it is always passed with a bipartisan cheer.

H.R.3080
Latest Title: Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014

Sponsor: Rep Shuster, Bill [PA-9] (introduced 9/11/2013) Cosponsors (47)

Related Bills: H.RES.385, H.R.399, H.R.3978, S.513, S.601

Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 113-121 [GPO: Text, PDF]

House Reports: 113-246 Part 1; Latest Conference Report: 113-449 (in Congressional Record H4065-4428)

Click here for full text of the bill.

Corrupt California Assembly Rules Committee kills transparency bill

Government Transparency Bill Killed on Partisan Vote
For Immediate Release: May 15, 2012 Jeff Greene 951-894-1232, Craig Deluz 916-319-2066
 

ACA 1 By Jeffries Would Have Required Bill Text be Published 24 Hours Before Votes
SACRAMENTO:  With little discussion, no questions, and no opportunity even to respond to false claims by the committee chair, Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries’ (R-Lake Elsinore) ACA 1 government transparency bill was killed in the Assembly Rules Committee on a straight party-line vote.
Frustrated by the legislative leadership’s unwillingness to allow legislators, the media, and the public the opportunity to read the text of legislation until hours or even minutes before they are voted upon, Kevin Jeffries has continually introduced legislation to require all legislation be publicly available at least 24 hours before they can come to a vote.  Yesterday’s hearing on ACA 1 was the first time one of these bills has received a hearing, after years of trying.
“It is an insult to democracy that the legislature refuses to obey the same basic rules of openness and public participation that they force on local governments with the Brown Act,” said Jeffries.  “We require cities, counties and special districts to follow these rules, but the leadership of the legislature insists on the right to force votes on bills that have not been reviewed or publicly available, often in the dark of night.  The ‘public’s right to know’ has clearly been replaced with the ‘government knows best,’ and that is one of the many reasons that the legislature is held in such incredibly low esteem by the voters in California.”
Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), the Chair of the Rules Committee, insisted in her brief remarks that existing protections and rules are sufficient, and that ACA 1 was unnecessary, and then called the vote without even giving Jeffries the opportunity to respond to her claims.
“It is ironic that the Chair of the Committee hails from the home of the free speech movement in California, but did not wish to have an actual dialogue about this important issue, and seems intent on keeping the public in the dark on issues that affect them,” said Jeffries.  “It is clear that she was forced into holding this hearing by negative public and media pressure in favor of my bill, but was only willing to give it the most cursory review before killing it.  I’m not sure when government transparency and the people’s right to know became a partisan issue, but it is very unfortunate for all Californians, regardless of party registration.”
ACA 1 had been endorsed by a variety of local governments, newspapers from around the state, and non-partisan organizations, including California League of Cities, California Common Cause, The First Amendment Coalition, and several Chambers of Commerce.  It had received no official opposition, and there was no public analysis of the bill prepared by the Rules Committee.
“Clearly the legislative leadership has no interest in reforming itself, and if change is going to come, it will have to be through the initiative process.  I am hopeful that one of the reform organizations contemplating initiative efforts, will include the 24 hour rule, as well as my other reform measure (ACA 2) that would prohibit midnight sessions out of the view of the public.”