New studies reported by CNN (here) are simply off-target. Why? Because they are based on unreliable climate models that rely on representations, not physics. Consider the graph below where the speculations of over 100 model runs are compared to actual temperature measurements.
“Greens are inventing elaborate fantasies of shadowy right wing conspiracies to explain President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Treaty – but still refuse to consider the possibility they are wrong about global warming.” click here
Posted in Climate
“The United States contributed $1 billion to the global Green Climate Fund, but the world’s top polluters contributed nothing, David Asman reported.” click here
“Die zeitversetzte globale Abkühlung durch La Niña setzt sich nach Februar und März auch im April 2017 vor allem bei den 2m-Temperaturen fort.”
Posted in Climate
The MIT letter (here) objecting to the letter sent by Richard Lindzen and other scientists is a good example of what happens when government funding gets out of control. Programs such as MIT depend on it. Dr. Lindzen has responded here. MIT is hardly to blame as other institutions would take the very same action if major government funding depends on maintaining and advancing a particular point of view (dogma). Until science is once again the focus no meaningful progress will be made towards lasting solutions to real problems resulting from climate changes.
“A combination of green inspired state moratoria on gas exploration, coupled with growing gas export capacity, and politically motivated closures of coal plants, has created a looming shortfall in Australian energy supply.” click here
“California has committed to moving forward with its job destroying climate policies, regardless of vocal complaints from business leaders.” click here for post at WUWT