This post is very interesting. The argument has been that “global warming” will happen on earth just like on Jupiter if atmospheric carbon dioxide is continues to increase. This study refutes that argument.
“Prior work has confirmed the gravito-thermal greenhouse effect on 8 planets including Earth, and why this falsifies the theory of catastrophic man-made global warming. On the basis of this new paper, we find the gravito-thermal greenhouse effect also holds for Jupiter and that the pressure vs. temperature curve satisfies the Poisson Relation of the gravito-thermal greenhouse effect.” click here
“The authors evaluate the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “consensus” that the increase of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere is of anthropogenic origin and is causing dangerous global warming, climate change and climate disruption. They conclude that the data does not support the supposition.” click here
“How much will the doubling of CO2 in the air warm the global temperature? How do scientists take an accurate measurement of the temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere? Why can scientists better measure atmospheric temperatures from satellites than surface temperatures from ground thermometers?” click here for answers
Gravito-Thermal greenhouse effect replaces Arrhenius as the best available science. From the Hockey Schtick:
“An excellent review of the Kinetic Theory of Gases, similar to Feynman’s lecture 40 on the Statistical Mechanics of the Atmosphere, and explains the fundamental basis of the 33C Maxwell et al Gravito-Thermal greenhouse effect (& which also falsifies the Arrhenius radiative-greenhouse effect).
The review also explains the fundamental reasons why the false analogies of inflated tires or static, closed gas cylinders to our atmosphere are incorrect.” click here for complete post.
An important but very technical point regarding lapse rate as it relates to a theoretically pure (N2) atmosphere is discussed here.
At issue is the relevance of the Arrhenius radiative greenhouse theory. The Maxwell et al gravito-thermal greenhouse effect is replacing “Arrhenius” as the best science-based explanation.
Click here for an excerpt from the lectures of Richard Feynman well worth reading.
The newspaper headline claim:
“Scientists have witnessed carbon dioxide trapping heat in the atmosphere above the United States, showing human-made climate change ‘in the wild’ for the first time.” click here
In reality, the “interpretation” given to the analysis presented in this article and this paper simply finds what has already been assumed from the beginning. Indeed, the statement “The data say what the data say,” is false. Data do not speak or talk. Data is interpreted. Assumptions and underlying presuppositions determine the conclusions.
Data says nothing. Scientists say what they believe to be the meaning of the data. And the researchers can believe as they would like. The article states that “The study is good technical work,” and perhaps it is. [I’m not questioning anyones intelligence here. I am questioning the underlying assumptions made.]
The news article quote regarding study saying that the results are ” expected — sort of like confirming gravity with a falling rock ” strongly suggests that the researchers have simply read into the data conclusions that have been assumed from the beginning.
Upon closure scrutiny it becomes clear that the claims made are not supported by the study itself.
“Either way, what the study shows, is that increasing CO2 has had very little effect on water vapour levels or near surface air temperature in Alaska, and is easily overcome by natural variability.” click here
The interpretation and attribution made looks to be in the minds of the researchers and those with similar underlying assumptions.